Archive for June, 2011

Review: Going Cowboy Crazy

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

DEBUT!Going Cowboy Crazy
Author: Katie Lane
Publisher: Grand Central
Line: Forever
Pub. Date: May 1, 2011
ISBN-13: 978-0446582780
Retail: $5.99 ~ New low price
Pages: 384

DOUBLE TROUBLE

Faith Aldridge wants answers. Bramble, Texas is the only place she can find them . . . as well as Hope, the identical twin sister she never knew she had. But the townsfolk reckon that shy city-girl Faith is really her long-lost sister Hope, back in Bramble at last. And they’re fixin’ to do whatever it takes to heat things up between her and Hope’s long-time flame, Slate Calhoun. If that means rustling her car, spreading rumors like wildfire, and reining in some explosive secrets, well, there’s no way like the Lone Star way . . .

But Slate’s no fool. The woman in his truck may look like Hope, yet the way she feels in his arms is altogether new. He’s determined to keep this twin in his bed and out of his heart. Trouble is, the real Hope is headed home, and she’s got her own designs on Slate. If Faith wants to avoid heartbreak, she’ll have to show a certain ruggedly handsome cowboy that this crazy-impossible love is worth fighting for.

~*~*~

Faith Aldridge didn’t know what to expect when she arrived in the small west Texas town of Bramble looking for the twin sister she’s never met, but she certainly didn’t anticipate meeting a man like Slate Calhoun. The rest of the town mistakes her for Hope, her twin, but Slate knows the second he kisses her that this polished city slicker isn’t his oldest friend.

The chemistry between these two ratchets up to white hot in no time, but misconceptions abound. The towns people, convinced that Faith is Hope, and laboring under the delusion that Hope and Slate are MFOE (made for each other), hold Faith’s car hostage and refuse to let her leave town until “Hope” and Slate are together.

With no place to go, Faith finds herself sucked into the town and into Slate’s arms. But Bramble and Slate have more layers than she expected, some of them more troubling than others. Finding allies in Shirlene, wife of the town’s richest citizen, and Austin, one of Slate’s football players who hides behind a badittude and smart mouth, Faith begins to realize that it’s time for her to live for herself – and for love.

Overall, I enjoyed this book quite a bit. It really reminded me of an early Rachel Gibson (Daisy’s Back in Town) or early Susan Elizabeth Phillips (Lady Be Good). As a Texas girl, I enjoyed the setting, although I thought it might have been a bit over done. Still, the small town fishbowl really worked for the development of the characters and provided a nice little microcosm for the love story to blossom. The twins separated at birth storyline bugged me until Lane tossed in a twist that added a unique layer of complexity and depth to the story that I appreciated.

As in most Texas tales, the supporting cast is fun. Shirlene steps in and fulfills Faith’s need for a female ally in a town of slightly crazy people and pushes her to step outside of her comfort zone to embrace the woman she can be. Young Austin serves as a well placed mirror for Slate, a reminder of his own troubled youth so that he can connect with his football team and lead them to the victory every Texas high school football team strives for.

As main characters, Faith and Slate were delightfully flawed. Slate is the typical town football star-turned coach complete with good looks and smoldering hazel eyes, but the intuitive, compassionate side of him Lane made sure to include made him a dynamic, interesting partner for good girl Faith. The differences between quiet computer programmer Faith and her larger than life twin Hope were a bit conventional, but with Slate, Faith became a sassy, intriguing heroine who could take on the entire town and the tough Texas boy’s pigheaded nature.

~ Taylor

Rating: 7.5 (Better than just Good)

Heat Level: 4 (Hot)

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
RATE THIS BOOK!
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Make sure you check out the next book in Katie’s series, MAKE MINE A BAD BOY. It’s a June release and I’m giving away an ARC on the website. Click here for entry details.

Would you like to try out this new author? I’m giving away an ARC of GOING COWBOY CRAZY to one lucky commenter. :)

Winners and other news

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Congratulations, Meghan! Please email your snail mail address to me at contests at theseasonforromance dot com and remember to include the title of the book you won. You have one week to collect your prize.

~*~*~

The Season’s June issue is up! Remember, if you’ve read any of the May or June releases and would like to opine about them, I would love to have readers comments/reviews. I’m trying to get 20 reviews in one week so I can start offloading some of these books. ;) .  There is one person who has been very good about leaving great feedback and that is….

WENDY P

Congratulations, Wendy! Please contact me at the email address above and email the title of any mass market paperback currently featured on my site as well as your snail mail address.

 

Does it matter what an author looks like?

Wednesday, June 1st, 2011

by Kat Latham

Have you ever scheduled a professional photography session, then woken up five minutes beforehand, not taking time to wash, brush your hair or gather enough energy to smile?

Neither have I—at least, not since a hot guy I liked looked at my college ID photo and said, “Ugh! Looks like you just woke up from a crack sleep.”

Authors take a lot of care over the photo that will be printed in the back of their books and all around the internet as they promote their work. Debut authors today even get their blog, Facebook and Twitter followers involved in selecting the best photo.

Why? Because, to a certain extent, it matters what we look like. We all want to present ourselves in a way that makes readers feel connected with us, and humans connect when they can read signals in each other’s faces—like a friendly smile. And thank God we do that, because looking around the animal kingdom, it seems that the alternative is sniffing each other’s rear-bits, and I dread to think how publishers would replicate that in the back of a book.

The problem is that we’ve all got insecurities, right? Please tell me I’m not alone in this. Several weeks ago I asked a professional photographer friend at work if he’d take some pictures of me for my blog. Most of the photos I have of myself are taken on holiday, where I look happy but sweaty or tired. Ever since Mat agreed to take my picture, I’ve been putting off the date. My hair’s too shaggy. My brows are too bushy. My chin’s too…well, let’s be kind and say “undefined”.

Those are mostly things I can control. But what about characteristics that we can’t control—like our age—which can lead to others judging us?

Personally, the only reason I look at author photos is because reading a book is an intimate experience, and when I love a story I want to see the person whose amazing imagination developed it. I don’t care whether I personally find them attractive or not, and I’ve never judged an author for looking a certain way.

This isn’t something I’d thought about much until last week, when the Daily Fail, *cough* excuse me, Daily Mail, printed an article that would offend anyone with half a brain and a smidgen of heart. I recommend you don’t read it.

The journalist (and I do use that term very loosely here) went to the summer party for the UK’s Romantic Novelists’ Association, and came back with an outrageous article called ”The Blue Rinse and Bodice Rippers: In twin-sets and pearls meet the ladies behind Britain’s steamiest novels”.

The gist of the article is “Ew! Old ladies write pervy books!”

This kind of prejudice against authors seems reserved for romance novelists. In a genre where we tend to write about youth, beauty and sexual attraction, the assumption is that any novelist who doesn’t fit society’s image of those qualities is somehow fair game for mockery. Forget her talent and dedication to staking out a career in a notoriously difficult industry. Forget the years of life experience that she could draw on to create deeply nuanced characters.

Forget everything about her, except that she’s old.

Author Kate Johnson came up with the idea for authors to post pictures of themselves with the title “This is what a romantic novelist looks like”. There’s a Facebook page where writers can come together and celebrate the diversity of our genre by showing you can’t pigeonhole romance novelists as being any one thing.

The Facebook page does brilliantly focus on the diversity of our personalities—as anyone who follows lots of romance novelists online can quickly see we’re a quirky bunch, no matter what we look like.

But is this continued focus on what we look like a good thing? Does it continue to marginalize older authors who might feel their picture would be unwanted because they may fit the stereotype? Or authors who are self-conscious about the way they look anyway? Should it really matter what we look like?

As difficult as it is to make non-romance readers appreciate the genre, should we not focus on that instead?

What do you think? Comment and enter to win Bethany Kane’s ADDICTED TO YOU!

Click for book details and buy links