Last night on Twitter, I bemoaned the state of single title contemporary romances. What’s the problem, you ask? I’m trying to understand why are there so few of them coming out from the big New York publishers every month?
This isn’t something I just noticed. I noticed this several years back and at every writer’s conference, an editor in almost every house announces they are ‘actively looking’ for ‘big’ single title contemporaries. Unfortunately, when I go to the book stores, I don’t see anything new. I see books from new historical and paranormal romance authors, but no new contemporary romances. Why is that? Seriously, do readers not want to read single title contemporaries anymore?
Are the publishers telling us that historical and paranormal romances sell more than contemporary romances? Does that mean we have to wait for some ‘new, hot contemporary author’ to burst onto the scene and make a huge splash before we see more books on the shelves. But I wonder how that happens because I don’t see anyone taking a chance on an unknown ST contemporary author. Seems like a vicious circle.
I can seriously count on my hands the number of single title contemporary titles I have to choose from each month. Not many. Maybe 2 or 3 if I’m lucky. On a good month, I may see 4. In comparison, there are like a gazillion historical and paranormal romances coming out every month. On a side note, when I say contemporary, I talking strictly romance. I’m not talking romantic suspense or time-travel (don’t see many of those either) or anything that even borders on women’s fiction. I’m talking a story that is essentially about one couple’s relationship pure and simple.
I absolutely love the genre and am so saddened that I don’t have more books to choose from. Many of the popular authors of this genre put out only one book a year. That wouldn’t be so bad if there were like 40 or more of them but with their numbers so low, one book a year just won’t do. I need more. I want more. I read category–Harlequin, of course (only game in town) but when I yearn for a longer more involved book with juicy subplots, I’m really stumped unless one of my contemporary authors happens to have a book out that month–which is very rare. That’s actually the reason I started reading historicals after reading categories for years and years. I was looking for that longer read. Each fills a need and right now only one is being met.
Last night, Christina Dodd did mention she has a contemporary series coming out in 2011, which is good news but I’m still looking for more. The really great news to me is if I heard that there were 10 new ST contemporary authors debuting this year. Man, that would be music to my ears.
So am I the only one out there that feels that way? Does anyone else want to see those New York publishers putting out more single title contemporary romances? I truly believe that if they did, readers would flock to them in droves.










